California Public Defenders Association Responds to the Recentfarabee Study On Proposition 36 Participants
U.S. Newswire › December 06, 2004
Linked as:
U.S. Newswire › December 06, 2004
Linked as:Summary
SACRAMENTO, Calif., Dec. 6 /U.S. Newswire/ -- The California Public Defenders Association today released the following in response to the recent David Farabee study showing that during Proposition 36's first six months participants had a high re-arrest rate for drugs, but not for property crimes or violent crimes:
"Undoubtedly, a statewide initiative the size of (Proposition 36) will take several years to become established and operate as intended. Therefore, analysis based on early (results) cannot be assumed to reflect the eventual impact of this initiative. Indeed, Proposition 36 remains a work in progress," wrote David Farabee, the author of a study widely reported in California's newspapers, concerning re-arrest rates for a small sample of 688 drug offenders enrolled in Proposition 36 treatment programs in the first six months of the initiatives implementation.See the full content of this document
Extract
California Public Defenders Association Responds to the Recentfarabee Study On Proposition 36 Participants
During Proposition 36's first six months, up to Jan. 1, 2002, Farabee's study, sponsored by the National Institute of Drug Abuse (NIDA), concluded that Proposition 36 clients "remained more likely to be rearrested for a drug crime" relative to non-...
See the full content of this document
Sponsored links
ver las páginas en versión mobile | web
ver las páginas en versión mobile | web
© Copyright 2012, vLex. All Rights Reserved.
Contents in vLex United States
Explore vLex
For Professionals
For Partners
Company
Other documents:
30 CFR 62.180 - Training. | 9 CFR 590.910 - Eligibility of foreign countries for importation of egg products into the U... | 14 cfr 29.1323 airspeed indicating system. | u.s. v. anderson, (10th cir. 1998) | Sentencia nº 761 de Consiglio di Stato February 12 2008 | sentencia nº 2288 de consiglio di stato, april 13, 2011 | Sentencia nº 5252 de Consiglio di Stato September 30 2008 | sentencia nº 314 de consiglio di stato, september 15, 2010