Judicial Watch Fights Aclu Intervention in Special Order 40 Suit ; Hearing Scheduled for Sept. 20 in the Superior Court for the State of California, County of Los Angeles
U.S. Newswire › September 19, 2006
Linked as:
U.S. Newswire › September 19, 2006
Linked as:Summary
WASHINGTON, Sept. 19 /U.S. Newswire/ -- Judicial Watch, the public interest group that investigates and prosecutes government corruption, announced today that the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) Foundation of Southern California has filed a motion to allow illegal immigrant and other groups to intervene in Judicial Watch's lawsuit against the LAPD over "Special Order 40," a set of policies that prevents police officers from inquiring about an individual's immigration status and communicating freely with federal immigration officials (Harold P. Sturgeon v. William J. Bratton, et al., Case No. BC351646). Judicial Watch filed a motion opposing the attempted intervention. A hearing on the matter is scheduled on Sept. 20, in Superior Court for the State of California, County of Los Angeles.
"Proposed Intervenors (the ACLU's clients) should not be allowed to use this Court and its process to help undocumented aliens violate the law, and granting them intervenor status to do so would turn the law on its head," Judicial Watch argued in its court filing opposing the ACLU. "Clearly, assisting undocumented aliens to remain undetected by federal immigration officials and helping undocumented aliens to secure unlawful employment do not constitute proper, lawful interests."See the full content of this document
Extract
Judicial Watch Fights Aclu Intervention in Special Order 40 Suit ; Hearing Scheduled for Sept. 20 in the Superior Court for the State of California, County of Los Angeles
The ACLU is representing Break the Cycle, Los Jornaleros, El Comite de J...
See the full content of this document
Sponsored links
ver las páginas en versión mobile | web
ver las páginas en versión mobile | web
© Copyright 2012, vLex. All Rights Reserved.
Contents in vLex United States
Explore vLex
For Professionals
For Partners
Company
Other documents:
For the Record | Snapshots | Frenkel, James | Brienzo Daniel J. Sr. | sentencia nº 6174 de consiglio di stato december 16 2009 | sentencia nº 430 de consiglio di stato january 27 2010 | Sentencia nº 6309 de Consiglio di Stato December 21 2009 | sentencia nº 3314 de consiglio di stato june 17 2008