Federal Court Must Decide: Is the Treasury Department's Support of Aig's Shariah-Promoting Subsidiaries Constitutional?
Linked as:
Summary
How is it possible that the U.S. Government allows AIG to funnel more than $1 billion to companies that promote Shariah -- the very Islamic legal system that calls for jihad against apostates and infidels?
WASHINGTON, June 8 /PRNewswire-USNewswire/ -- The Law Offices of David Yerushalmi, P.C., together with the Thomas More Law Center, filed a motion for summary judgment on Monday, June 7, 2010, on behalf of Kevin Murray against the Treasury Department and the FED in the federal lawsuit pending in the Eastern District of Michigan. The lawsuit, captioned Murray v. Geithner et al. was brought by attorneys David Yerushalmi and Robert Muise, representing the plaintiff, Kevin Murray, a taxpayer and former combat Marine who served in Iraq. The federal lawsuit alleges that the U.S. government's takeover and financial bailout of AIG was in violation of the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment.See the full content of this document
Extract
Federal Court Must Decide: Is the Treasury Department's Support of Aig's Shariah-Promoting Subsidiaries Constitutional?
Specifically, at the time of the government bailout (beginning in September 2008 and continuing to the present), AIG was (and still is) the world leader in promoting Shariah-compliant insurance products. Shariah is Islamic law, and it is the identical legal doctrine that demands capital punishment for apostasy and blasphemy and provides the l...
See the full content of this document
Sponsored links
